One approval row, with its linked public evidence and dated research. A company-page match is not automatically a confirmed applicant identity. Approval is not proof of payment.
Support-package value
R 60 000
Approval date as listed
22-01-26
Municipality / district
eThekwini / eThekwini
Province
KwaZulu-Natal
01 · Source record
Where this row comes from
Annexure A · row 70 of 1,386. This is also one of the original 162 rows. It is counted once in the full register, not added again.
Annexure A is a SACR-shared public-channel copy. Its chain of custody to SEDFA has not been independently verified. The source copy is preserved below.
Earlier transcription
Vukuzenele Tuck shop
Annexure A transcription
Vukuzenzele Tuck shop
Both names remain searchable. This is a source-transcription difference, not evidence that the company changed its name.
2 public company files are linked in the approved review. Read each match basis; multiple candidates are kept separate.
Public company record · reviewed 28 August 2026
VUKUZENZELE TUCK SHOP
B2007044552
Link basis: exact normalised public-name match; entity link remains a candidate
An exact public company page corroborates the legal entity. A name-level schedule match does not by itself prove applicant identity, operation, eligibility, approval, disbursement or payment.
Link basis: exact normalised public-name match; entity link remains a candidate
An exact public company page corroborates the legal entity. A name-level schedule match does not by itself prove applicant identity, operation, eligibility, approval, disbursement or payment.
A directory role does not establish ownership or control. Matching officer names do not prove the same natural person, and a related-company link does not establish receipt of funding.
03 · Research history
Earlier findings stay on the record
These are dated observations, not additional beneficiaries or a current status verdict. Later sources can add to or conflict with earlier ones.
No earlier row-specific public research notes are attached in this release.
04 · What remains open
What would close the gaps?
A source-backed legal-identity link wherever the existing match is only a candidate.
Dated shop-operation and eligibility records for this approval.
A row-level delivery or payment record, reconciled to the approval and recipient.
New evidence should attach to this same row and retain its source and review date. Shared names, officers or repeated schedule entries are leads to test, not findings of wrongdoing.