FIXSA!HomeSpaza Shop Fund · Master registerEvidence hub →

Approval evidence file · 0810

Zamokuhle Tuck shop

Expanded Annexure A

Public company evidence linked

One approval row, with its linked public evidence and dated research. A company-page match is not automatically a confirmed applicant identity. Approval is not proof of payment.

Support-package value
R 60 000
Approval date as listed
26-05-26
Municipality / district
Maphumulo / iLembe
Province
KwaZulu-Natal

01 · Source record

Where this row comes from

Annexure A · row 810 of 1,386. This row is in the later part of Annexure A, beyond the original 162.

Annexure A is a SACR-shared public-channel copy. Its chain of custody to SEDFA has not been independently verified. The source copy is preserved below.

02 · Company connections

The public evidence attached to this row

1 public company file is linked in the approved review. Read each match basis; multiple candidates are kept separate.

Public company record · reviewed 28 August 2026

ZAMOKUHLE TUCK SHOP

K2013137724

Link basis: exact normalised public-name match; entity link remains a candidate

An exact public company page corroborates the legal entity. A name-level schedule match does not by itself prove applicant identity, operation, eligibility, approval, disbursement or payment.

Source-reported status
Deregistered due to annual return non compliance
Legal form
Private company
Incorporation date
2013-08-07
Officers, related companies & web footprint

Officers listed by the public source

Related companies

Additional public sources

Four checks. Separate conclusions.

These stages describe the evidence shown here—not a score for the business.

  1. Registry searched

    Not shown per file

    The site-wide registry count is not a per-company receipt. This file cites an open directory record; it does not expose an authenticated search log.

  2. Applicant identity

    Candidate link only

    0 of 2 linked approval rows print this exact identifier. This does not establish eligibility or payment.

    Evidence for this stage ↗
  3. Public footprint checked

    Directory reviewed

    1 additional source leads recorded. A directory record or source lead does not, on its own, verify a shop's operation.

    Evidence for this stage ↗
  4. Funding evidence verified

    Payment not established

    Approval entries are available. No linked payment evidence is supplied in this company release.

Open the evidence timeline · 5 dated entries

Events and discoveries

Ordered by event date where known, otherwise by capture date. A capture records when we saw a source—not when its status took effect.

  1. Reported event

    Incorporation reported by directory

    Event date
    Captured / reviewed

    This is the directory's reported incorporation date, not the date a shop opened or funding eligibility was established.

    Read the supporting source ↗
  2. Reported event

    Approval schedule · row 727

    Event date
    Captured / reviewed
    Not recorded for this event

    This row is a candidate company link; the applicant identity remains unresolved.

    Read the supporting source ↗
  3. Reported event

    Approval schedule · row 810

    Event date
    Captured / reviewed
    Not recorded for this event

    This row is a candidate company link; the applicant identity remains unresolved.

    Read the supporting source ↗
  4. Source observation

    Status observed: Deregistered due to annual return non compliance

    Event date
    Effective date unknown
    Captured / reviewed

    reviewed collection date; time not recorded. A capture date does not establish when this status began or ended.

    Read the supporting source ↗
  5. Source observation

    Status observed: Deregistered due to annual return non compliance

    Event date
    Effective date unknown
    Captured / reviewed

    record capture. A capture date does not establish when this status began or ended.

    Read the supporting source ↗
Open this company in the cross-check ledger →

A directory role does not establish ownership or control. Matching officer names do not prove the same natural person, and a related-company link does not establish receipt of funding.

03 · Research history

Earlier findings stay on the record

These are dated observations, not additional beneficiaries or a current status verdict. Later sources can add to or conflict with earlier ones.

24 August 2026 · company check · K2025179467

ZAMOKUHLE TUCK SHOP

Historical link basis: name only candidate. Registry/public status comparison: aligned.

Source-reported status: In Business · Private company · incorporated 26 February 2025

24 August 2026 · company check · K2025477515

ZAMOKUHLE TUCKSHOP

Historical link basis: name only candidate. Registry/public status comparison: aligned.

Source-reported status: In Business · Private company · incorporated 12 June 2025

    24 August 2026 · company check · K2012099886

    ZAMOKUHLE TUCKSHOP

    Historical link basis: name only candidate. Registry/public status comparison: semantically aligned.

    Source-reported status: Deregistered due to annual return non compliance · Private company · incorporated 7 June 2012

      24 August 2026 · company check · K2013137724

      ZAMOKUHLE TUCK SHOP

      Historical link basis: name only candidate. Registry/public status comparison: semantically aligned.

      Source-reported status: Deregistered due to annual return non compliance · Private company · incorporated 7 August 2013

      24 August 2026 · company check · K2024791976

      ZAMOKUHLE TUCKSHOP

      Historical link basis: name only candidate. Registry/public status comparison: aligned.

      Source-reported status: In Business · Private company · incorporated 1 December 2024

      04 · What remains open

      What would close the gaps?

      • A source-backed legal-identity link wherever the existing match is only a candidate.
      • Dated shop-operation and eligibility records for this approval.
      • A row-level delivery or payment record, reconciled to the approval and recipient.

      This opens a search, not a verified pin: Search Google Maps ↗.

      New evidence should attach to this same row and retain its source and review date. Shared names, officers or repeated schedule entries are leads to test, not findings of wrongdoing.