FIXSA!HomeSpaza Shop Fund · Master registerEvidence hub →

Approval evidence file · 0085

Thandi's Tuck shop

Original 162 · included in Annexure A

Public company evidence linked

One approval row, with its linked public evidence and dated research. A company-page match is not automatically a confirmed applicant identity. Approval is not proof of payment.

Support-package value
R 60 000
Approval date as listed
22-01-26
Municipality / district
eThekwini / eThekwini
Province
KwaZulu-Natal

01 · Source record

Where this row comes from

Annexure A · row 85 of 1,386. This is also one of the original 162 rows. It is counted once in the full register, not added again.

Annexure A is a SACR-shared public-channel copy. Its chain of custody to SEDFA has not been independently verified. The source copy is preserved below.

02 · Company connections

The public evidence attached to this row

1 public company file is linked in the approved review. Read each match basis; multiple candidates are kept separate.

Public company record · reviewed 28 August 2026

THANDI'S TUCK SHOP

B1999054556

Link basis: exact normalised public-name match; entity link remains a candidate

An exact public company page corroborates the legal entity. A name-level schedule match does not by itself prove applicant identity, operation, eligibility, approval, disbursement or payment.

Source-reported status
Deregistered due to annual return non compliance
Legal form
Close corporation
Incorporation date
1999-09-14

Other schedule links for this company: None in this public review. These links do not establish multiple payments.

Officers, related companies & web footprint

Officers listed by the public source

Related companies

Additional public sources

No additional public source attached in this review.

Four checks. Separate conclusions.

These stages describe the evidence shown here—not a score for the business.

  1. Registry searched

    Not shown per file

    The site-wide registry count is not a per-company receipt. This file cites an open directory record; it does not expose an authenticated search log.

  2. Applicant identity

    Candidate link only

    0 of 1 linked approval rows print this exact identifier. This does not establish eligibility or payment.

    Evidence for this stage ↗

  3. Public footprint checked

    Directory reviewed

    0 additional source leads recorded. A directory record or source lead does not, on its own, verify a shop's operation.

    Evidence for this stage ↗

  4. Funding evidence verified

    Payment not established

    Approval entries are available. No linked payment evidence is supplied in this company release.

Open the evidence timeline · 3 dated entries

Events and discoveries

Ordered by event date where known, otherwise by capture date. A capture records when we saw a source—not when its status took effect.

  1. Reported event

    Incorporation reported by directory

    Event date
    Captured / reviewed

    This is the directory's reported incorporation date, not the date a shop opened or funding eligibility was established.

    Read the supporting source ↗
  2. Reported event

    Approval schedule · row 85

    Event date
    Captured / reviewed
    Not recorded for this event

    This row is a candidate company link; the applicant identity remains unresolved.

    Read the supporting source ↗
  3. Source observation

    Status observed: Deregistered due to annual return non compliance

    Event date
    Effective date unknown
    Captured / reviewed

    record capture. A capture date does not establish when this status began or ended.

    Read the supporting source ↗
Open this company in the cross-check ledger →

A directory role does not establish ownership or control. Matching officer names do not prove the same natural person, and a related-company link does not establish receipt of funding.

03 · Research history

Earlier findings stay on the record

These are dated observations, not additional beneficiaries or a current status verdict. Later sources can add to or conflict with earlier ones.

No earlier row-specific public research notes are attached in this release.

04 · What remains open

What would close the gaps?

  • A source-backed legal-identity link wherever the existing match is only a candidate.
  • Dated shop-operation and eligibility records for this approval.
  • A row-level delivery or payment record, reconciled to the approval and recipient.

This opens a search, not a verified pin: Search Google Maps ↗.

New evidence should attach to this same row and retain its source and review date. Shared names, officers or repeated schedule entries are leads to test, not findings of wrongdoing.